Students in racially and socioeconomically integrated schools experience academic, cognitive, and social benefits that are not available to students in racially isolated, high-poverty environments. A growing number of school districts and charter schools across the country are promoting socioeconomic and racial integration by considering socioeconomic factors in student assignment policies.
As of 2016, The Century Foundation has identified a total of one hundred districts and charter networks across the country that use socioeconomic status as a factor in student assignment. When The Century Foundation (TCF) first began supporting research on socioeconomic school integration in 1996, it could find only two districts that employed a conscious plan using socioeconomic factors to pursue integration. In 2007, when TCF began compiling a list of class-conscious districts, researchers identified roughly forty districts that used student socioeconomic status in assignment procedures. Nine years later, TCF has found that figure has more than doubled, to one hundred, including eighty-six school districts and fourteen charter schools or networks.
The one hundred school districts and charter schools with socioeconomic integration policies enroll over 4.4 million students. Roughly 9 percent of all public school students currently attend school districts or charter schools that use socioeconomic status as a factor in student assignment.
The school districts and charter networks identified as employing socioeconomic integration are located in thirty-two different states. The states with the greatest number of districts and charters pursuing socioeconomic integration are California, Florida, Iowa, New York, Minnesota, and North Carolina.
One hundred school districts and charter schools
pursuing socio-economic integration
The majority of districts and charters on the list have racially and socioeconomically diverse enrollments. All but seven districts and charter schools identified by TCF have no single racial or ethnic group comprising 70 percent or more of the student body. All but twenty of the districts and charters have rates of free or reduced price lunch eligibility that are less than 70 percent.
The majority of the integration strategies observed fall into five main categories: attendance zone boundaries, district-wide choice policies, magnet school admissions, charter school admissions, and transfer policies. Some districts use a combination of methods. The most common strategy for promoting socioeconomic integration used by districts and charters is redrawing school attendance boundaries, observed in forty school districts; twenty-seven districts include magnet schools that consider socioeconomic status in their admissions processes; seventeen districts have transfer policies that consider socioeconomic status; sixteen districts use some form of district-wide choice policies with explicit consideration of diversity in the design of these programs; and sixteen charters networks and school districts have charter school lottery processes that consider socioeconomic status in order to promote diverse enrollment.
EDITOR’S NOTE: This piece was originally published on February 9, 2016 and has been updated as of October 14, 2016 to reflect the growing number of American schools now using socioeconomic status as a factor in student assignment.
The Growth of Socioeconomic School Integration
Students in racially and socioeconomically integrated schools experience academic, cognitive, and social benefits that are not available to students in racially isolated, high-poverty environments. A growing number of school districts and charter schools across the country are promoting socioeconomic and racial integration by considering socioeconomic factors in student assignment policies.
One hundred school districts and charter schools
pursuing socio-economic integration
Sign up for updates.
Adapted from “A New Wave of School Integration: Districts and Charters Pursuing Socioeconomic Diversity” (2016) by Halley Potter, Kimberly Quick, and Elizabeth Davies as well as “School Integration in Practice: Lessons from Nine Districts” (2016) by Richard D. Kahlenberg, Halley Potter, Kimberly Quick, Suchi Saxena, Carole Learned-Miller, and Kim Bridges.
EDITOR’S NOTE: This piece was originally published on February 9, 2016 and has been updated as of October 14, 2016 to reflect the growing number of American schools now using socioeconomic status as a factor in student assignment.
Related posts:
Tags: socioeconomic integration, charter schools, school diversity, socioeconomic diversity, school integration, facts